Good morning Omar. I will attempt to answer your question but will also undoubtedly leave some gaps in my response that others may better fill.
There are several different types of Six Simga programs. The Lean Six Sigma (and Toyota is often mentioned) is what you are thinking of it seems on industrial processes and manufacturing techniques. Terms like "Spaghetti Charts" are useful to understand not only in the industry, but also in how you arrange your kitchen on the cooking and cleaning cycles. Helpful, but not really relevant to chemical engineers. It can be, but it's not a perfect match in my mind.
There's also "MAIC" (also sometimes called DMAIC, LMAICL, LDMAICL, etc...) but at the root of it is Measure, Analyze, Improve, & Control. L is for Leveraging (both into your project and afterwards to other projects). The D is for "Define"...define the problem.
In these stages are processes like determining whether your measurement system is adequate and able to define the level of accuracy required to determine whether a defect exists, analyzing the root causes of the defects, implementing improvements to the system, and then installing a control system which will sustain the gains of improvements and not "fall back to the way we used to be".
This is very relevant to chemical engineers. I'm a chem. E (obviously), I got my Black Belt at a major chemical company, and am always very appreciative of that training. I have used it many times across my consulting / engineering company days even after leaving the chemical company world. Where I used it (2 examples only) within the chemical company are:
A). Specialty chemical injection for a mining water application in salt domes--saved $80k / yr, and continues to operate today (> 10 years later)
B). Pump discharge pressure on VFD's vs. required pressure. Saved over $100k/yr and continues to operate today (>11 years later).
Both were interesting but from a chemical engineer's standpoint, neither was terribly complex. The pump system kind of was, but in my mind was simple hydraulics issues and valve positioning feedback.
I've seen some Six Sigma storyboards where the chemical engineers dive into the details and savings exceed $1MM/month by defining defects in the process and using statistics to identify the root cause, which may or may not include operations procedural issues.
I encourage taking courses to LEARN about it, but the best learning is doing it and being mentored. I don't like when companies say they "require" a certification, as the culture and practices at each company may not directly leverage to other places. But if that's the door you are facing, then taking an online course is likely best to learn the material, and then apply it first chance you get.
By the way--I do NOT have recommendations as to which courses to take...I hope others will reply.
Hope this is helpful.
------------------------------
Eric Parvin PE
Owner / Process Manager
Highlands Ranch CO
------------------------------
Original Message:
Sent: 07-23-2019 08:00
From: Omar Abdelaty
Subject: Process improvement and six sigma; is it for chemical engineers?
Hey there!
I saw a job posting in a company I want to join requiring six sigma green belt certification. I was not aware that such certification and it took me a while to learn more about the subject. My question is do you think it is the job of chemical engineer to be six sigma certified and applying it in his/her daily job. Isn't that an industrial engineer's function. If so why is not implemented in any ChE curriculum I saw and how do I learn these topics and start using them in my job as a chemical engineer.
Thanks
------------------------------
Omar Abdelaty
Ankara
------------------------------